Things team leaders say…and shouldn’t
We’ve all heard team leaders and managers say to things their teams during meetings and company briefings and accept them, no matter how trite because, they’ve become part of the tapestry of noise that makes up business speak.
The problem is that some of the things that team leaders say…they really shouldn’t.
Often the reason that they are said is to motivate and make staff feel good about themselves to increase productivity or take on more work or start a new project.
Let’s take the phrase “Staff are our greatest asset”.
It’s not a lie and is often the truth but like any valuable asset, when needs must, people can be dispensed with to increase money in the bank (Redundancy). They are only an asset when they are doing what’s expected…when not they become a liability.
Many of us will have seen a staff member or a team move from “Hero to Zero” within days of making a mistake and “the greatest asset” a few weeks before becomes a liability.
“Do this for me”
Another phrase I’ve often heard is team leaders who ask the team to “do it for me” or “Do it for the company”.
Let’s get it in context. If the staff member or the team weren’t being paid a salary they wouldn’t be doing it at all…
Email me with things you think team leaders say and shouldn’t
I’ve become so interested in the noise that some companies make that I’m developing a new talk on the topic and if you have “things that team leaders say…and shouldn’t” please feel free to email me at: stephen@assimilatinmg-talent.com.
Don’t do it for me. The best email that I receive I’ll be sending a gift to!
Don’t ask “Can I Help You?”
Over the past few weeks I’ve been talking to some managers responsible for teams of sales assistants in large retail shops. The task was to show them how they could restructure their team’s approach to customers that would generate an increase in sales.
In this videoclip I tackle two main problems.
The first is the problem with asking “Can I help you?” that too often destroys a sale.
Secondly, how to generate multiple sales
Contact Stephen by email: stephen@assimilating-talent.com
The Paralysis of “You’re Brilliant”
Yesterday I had a great time with some business friends discussing the scandal of the NOTW and Rupert Murdock’s business empire. We all agreed that there have been lots of occasions when businesspeople believe their created image that they then become paralysed when things start to go pear shaped.
“You’re brilliant”
Director paralysis isn’t new. This often comes from having people around you that always tell you how brilliant you are. The more a business leader hears it the more they come to believe it. Murdock’s thousands telling him how brilliant he is seemed, at the start of the scandal, to create a paralysis of understanding of the seriousness of the situation. This, as is so often the case, was translated by the UK public as being arrogance.
Then again I’ve observed Directors of much smaller companies believe their own image and create similar problems for themselves. Like the Sales Director who joined an insurance company saying he had come to “save the company” when most people didn’t know, or believe, that it needed saving.
Or the Managing Director who told me that in twenty eight years at the head of his business he’d not made a “New hire mistake ever”. In fact he told me that he could identify a success when “they walked through the door“. His staff turnover was very high and continually created problems for his sales.
“Remember you are mortal”
As generals drove through the ancient Rome after winning a war a slave at the back of the chariot would whisper in their ear “Remember you are mortal” in case they believed the crowd’s adulation. I wonder how many CEO’s would consider hiring someone to continually question their thinking, just in case they thought themselves infallible?
Is Management to Blame for Staff Turnover?
I was asked a question on LinkedIn and this is a brief outline of my answer that I thought those in my network might find interesting
For many people there is a direct relationship with management
capability and high staff turnover. In my opinion, however, there also needs to be other
considerations before one always blames team managers.
I will often talk to CEO’s and team managers about their “Poach rate”. This
is a calculation that identifies the increase in the current salary that a competitor company has to pay to lure talent away and is represented as a percentage of the salary. The higher the percentage (around 10-15%) the more money has played a part in a person moving jobs. The manager may have little control over this given that pay scales are decided centrally.
If the Poach rate is less that 6% then the cause of the talent leaving is unlikely more likely to be poor culture, lack of training, lack of career structure or poor management style. In this circumstance the Company is responsible for driving away the staff member and if turnover is high then significant attention needs to be paid to these other factors.
Another aspect to why people leave a job is to consider the individual’s circumstances:
Young talent will look to improve their resume (CV) and will remain in a job for as long as they are learning, working on new projects and that the company continues to deliver value to their resume etc.
As soon as another company is identified as providing greater value then the young talent will
leave.
Talent aged 30 -50 may be seeking to maximise earnings or responsibility and if this is not available within their present position will seek to move. (Team managers often have little impact upon career ladders)
Over 50 talent will often seek to reduce responsibility and the time spent at work (once again the team manager has little impact on this area)
Too often, in my experience, blame is placed on “Salary” as a reason why talent leaves when in fact the real reasons are in the company’s power to prevent. A motivating statistic is that when a talented individual
leaves the RISK that further talent will follow increases by 50%.
Maria finalises restructure
Maria has announced to her team that she has finalised the restructure of the team roles and announced them to her team.
She is also bringing in a “Senior Assistant” to act as her deputy. Probably from her previous company